As a two-phase exercise in inter-district audit, with the emphasis on
critical evaluation of routine clinical practice, three rheumatologist
s each examined the same 44 patients with shoulder pain, and recorded
their diagnosis and the investigations and treatment they would carry
out. In the first phase, 26 patients were seen by each rheumatologist
separately; there was complete diagnostic agreement in only 46%, with
wide variation in the frequency of requests for standard investigation
s, but all three rheumatologists recommended steroid injections for mo
st patients. In the second phase, all three rheumatologists examined a
further 18 patients together, discussed the symptoms and signs, and r
ecorded their diagnoses separately. There was complete agreement in 78
%. The presence of more than one lesion, and differences in the interp
retation of certain physical signs, partly explain the lack of agreeme
nt in Phase 1. Treatment of specific shoulder lesions is highly concor
dant, with injection the major treatment modality, followed by physiot
herapy. Perhaps the different diagnoses reached, and the fact that tre
atment might therefore be administered for the wrong diagnosis, may ex
plain some treatment failures. Also, recruitment of patients for studi
es of the treatment of shoulder lesions requires care to avoid selecti
on of a heterogeneous group.