B. Lina et al., MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF A COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE PCR ASSAY FOR DIAGNOSING ENTEROVIRUS INFECTION IN A PANEL OF CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID SPECIMENS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(12), 1996, pp. 3002-3006
Thirteen laboratories participated in blind tests of a panel of 20 cod
ed cerebrospinal fluid specimens (7 uninfected samples, 3 samples infe
cted with 1 50% tissue culture infective dose [TCID50]/0.1 ml [nonente
rovirus strains], and 10 samples infected with 10, 1, or 0.1 TCID50/0.
1 ml [three different enterovirus serotypes]) on the Amplicor enterovi
rus PCR assay (Roche Diagnostic Systems). The panel was also evaluated
by in-house PCR (two nested-PCR and three one-step PCR assays) or tis
sue culture (eight laboratories). The viral load was shown to influenc
e greatly the sensitivity of the assay. The average sensitivity of the
Amplicor test ranged from 67 to 98% for viral titers of 1 to 10 TCID5
0/0.1 ml, respectively; titers of 0.1 TCID50/0.1 ml resulted in a sens
itivity of only 16%. The overall specificity of the Amplicor test was
98%. The Amplicor assay compared favorably to the five in-house PCR te
sts (no significant difference in either sensitivity or specificity) a
nd was much more sensitive than tissue culture (P < 0.001), even for h
igh viral loads. It was easy to perform, rapid (about 6 h), well-stand
ardized and appeared to be suitable far the diagnosis of enterovirus m
eningitis on a routine basis in laboratories trained in molecular biol
ogy techniques.