N. Veal et al., NOVEL DNA ASSAY FOR CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DETECTION - COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL CULTURE AND PP65 ANTIGENEMIA ASSAY, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(12), 1996, pp. 3097-3100
We compared conventional cytomegalovirus (CMV) isolation, rapid viral
culture, a CMV pp65 antigenemia assay, and a novel CMV DNA hybrid capt
ure system (HCS), A total of 309 blood samples from individuals in dif
ferent risk groups were assessed by at least two of the methods mentio
ned above, Leukocytes were recovered either after centrifugation in Le
ucosep tubes containing 1.080 Ficoll for pp65 assay or after simple di
fferential lysis steps for DNA detection, HCS was based on DNA hybridi
zation with a CMV RNA probe and its capture by antibodies to DNA-RNA h
ybrids, The CMV pp65 lower matrix protein was detected by fluorescence
with c10-c11 monoclonal antibody in formalin-fixed leukocytes. Concor
dant results were observed for 92.9, 78.3, and 82.7% of the patients w
hen comparing (i) viral culture and the pp65 antigenemia assay, (ii) v
iral culture and HCS, and (iii) the pp65 antigenemia assay and HCS, re
spectively, Discordant results were observed between a positive HCS re
sult and negative culture and/or pp65 results, These results were asso
ciated with relatively low DNA levels (<20 pg/10(6) cells) and positiv
e viruria, In conclusion, the pp65 antigenemia assay is a rapid and re
liable method of detecting CMV end is preferable to culture, but the M
urex HCS appears to be more sensitive for CMV detection.