M. Ruhnke et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF 3 ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST METHODS FOR CANDIDA-ALBICANS ISOLATES AND CORRELATION WITH RESPONSE TO FLUCONAZOLE THERAPY, Journal of clinical microbiology, 34(12), 1996, pp. 3208-3211
In vitro susceptibilities were determined for 56 Candida albicans isol
ates obtained from the Oral cavities of 41 patients with human immunod
eficiency virus infection. The agents tested included fluconazole, itr
aconazole, ketoconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B. MICs were de
termined by the broth microdilution technique following National Commi
ttee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-P (M27-P micro), a
broth microdilution technique using high-resolution medium (IIR micro
), and the Etest with solidified yeast-nitrogen base agar. The in vitr
o findings were correlated with in vivo response to fluconazole therap
y for oropharyngeal candidiasis. For all C. albicans isolates from pat
ients with oropharyngeal candidiasis not responding to fluconazole MIC
s were found to be greater than or equal to 6.25 mu g/ml by the M27-P
micro method and greater than or equal to 25 mu g/ml by the HR micro m
ethod as well as the Etest, However, for several C. albicans isolates
from patients who responded to fluconazole therapy MICs found to be ab
ove the suggested breakpoints of resistance, The appropriate rank orde
r of best agreement between the M27-P micro method and HR micro method
was amphotericin B > fluconazole > flucytosine > ketoconazole > itrac
onazole. The appropriate rank order with best agreement between the M2
7-P micro method and the Etest was flucytosine > amphotericin B > fluc
onazole > ketoconazole greater than or equal to itraconazole. It could
be concluded that a good correlation between in vitro resistance and
clinical failure was found with all methods. However, the test methods
used in this study did not necessarily predict clinical response to t
herapy with fluconazole.