E. Perucca, THE NEW-GENERATION OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS - ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 42(5), 1996, pp. 531-543
1 After a hiatus of over 20 years, several new antiepileptic drugs (vi
gabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, felbamat
e, zonisamide and tiagabine) have reached or approached the registrati
on phase. 2 Compared with older agents, many new drugs exhibit simpler
pharmacokinetics. This is especially true for vigabatrin and gabapent
in, which are renally eliminated and have a low interaction potential.
3 Unlike most of the older agents, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapenti
n and tiagabine are devoid of significant enzyme inducing or inhibitin
g properties. Topiramate, oxcarbazepine and felbamate may induce the m
etabolism of steroid oral contraceptives. In addition, felbamate also
acts as a metabolic inhibitor. 4 To date, the efficacy of new drugs ha
s been evaluated extensively only under add-on conditions in patients
with partial seizures (with or without secondary generalization) refra
ctory to conventional treatment. However, there is evidence that lamot
rigine, zonisamide, felbamate and, possibly, topiramate may also be ef
fective in generalized epilepsies. 5 In placebo-controlled studies, ty
pically between 15 and 40% of patients with difficult-to-treat partial
epilepsy have shown an improvement (defined as a 50% or greater decre
ase in seizure frequency) after addition of a new drug. Only a small m
inority of these patients achieved complete seizure control. 6 Compare
d with older agents, some of the new drugs may have a better tolerabil
ity profile. Felbamate, however, has been associated with a high risk
of aplastic anaemia and hepatotoxicity. 7 At present, the main use of
the new agents is in patients refractory to first-line drugs such as c
arbamazepine or valproate, and further studies are required to charact
erize their activity spectrum as well as their potential value in mono
therapy. In most patients, new drugs cannot be recommended for first-l
ine use until evidence is obtained that potential advantages in tolera
bility or ease of use outweigh the drawback of their high cost.