Ew. Terbraak et al., INJECTION SITE EFFECTS ON THE PHARMACOKINETICS AND GLUCODYNAMICS OF INSULIN LISPRO AND REGULAR INSULIN, Diabetes care, 19(12), 1996, pp. 1437-1440
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
OBJECTIVE - The pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of a new insulin an
alog, insulin lispro, and regular human insulin were compared and cont
rasted after subcutaneous administrations in femoral, deltoid, and abd
ominal injection sites. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - single 0.2 U/kg
doses of insulin lispro and regular insulin were administered to 12 he
althy subjects in a six-way randomized crossover fashion. Each dose wa
s given after an overnight fast in one of three injection sites: abdom
inal, deltoid, or femoral. Study drugs were given during a manual eugl
ycemic glucose clamp. Blood samples were collected over the 12-h clamp
for measurement of insulin-reactive components, with pharmacokinetic
and glucodynamic measurements derived from these serum insulin and cla
mp measurements. RESULTS - Glucodynamic comparisons between insulin li
stro and regular insulin showed a greater maximum infusion rate (R(max
)) at an earlier time (TR(max)), regardless of injection site. The tot
al glucose infused (G(tot)) showed nearly identical Values between sit
es for insulin lispro. Regular insulin showed greater G(tot). Values f
rom deltoid and femoral injections. When comparisons were made between
drugs, regular insulin produced significantly greater G(tot) primaril
y driven by the increased G(tot) from deltoid and femoral injections.
Greater maximum serum insulin concentrations (C-max) were experienced
with insulin lispro at earlier times (t(max)), regardless of the injec
tion sire (P < 0.001). Abdominal administrations produced the greatest
C-max values at the earliest t(max) for both regular insulin and insu
lin lispro. Deltoid and femoral injections had lower C-max values for
both compounds. Shifts also occurred with t(max), although these shift
s were much greater with regular insulin than with insulin lispro. Equ
ivalent area under the curve (AUC) values were found when compared bet
ween compounds. CONCLUSIONS - Slower absorption from deltoid and femor
al administrations resulted in an increased duration of action for bot
h regular insulin and insulin lispro when compared to abdominal admini
stration. However, notable increases in the onset of action were only
apparent with regular insulin. The consistency with insulin lispro res
ponse from abdominal and extremity injection sites allows more potenti
al sites for subcutaneous injection with an assured rapid response.