Conrad and Kaul (1993) report that most of De Bondt and Thaler's (1985
) long-term overreaction findings can be attributed to a combination o
f bid-ask effects when monthly cumulative average returns (CARs) are u
sed, and price, rather than prior returns. In direct tests, we find li
ttle difference in test-period returns whether CARs or buy-and-hold re
turns are used, and that price has little predictive ability in cross-
sectional regressions. The difference in findings between this study a
nd Conrad and Kaul's is primarily due to their statistical methodology
. They confound cross-sectional patterns and aggregate time-series mea
n reversion, and introduce a survivor bias. Their procedures increase
the influence of price at the expense of prior returns.