SPECIFIC ANTIBODY-RESPONSES TO SUBTILISIN CARLSBERG (ALCALASE) IN MICE - DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRANASAL EXPOSURE MODEL

Citation
Mk. Robinson et al., SPECIFIC ANTIBODY-RESPONSES TO SUBTILISIN CARLSBERG (ALCALASE) IN MICE - DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRANASAL EXPOSURE MODEL, Fundamental and applied toxicology, 34(1), 1996, pp. 15-24
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology
ISSN journal
02720590
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
15 - 24
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-0590(1996)34:1<15:SATSC(>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
An intranasal (i.n.) dosing model was developed in mice as a potential alternative to more difficult, time-consuming, and costly guinea pig intratracheal (GPIT) or mouse intratracheal models for assessment of t he respiratory immunogenicity of detergent enzymes. Using a benchmark enzyme, Alcalase (protease subtilisin Carlsberg), studies were conduct ed to standardize the model in terms of mouse strain, dosing and serum harvest regimen, and the primary immunoglobulin endpoint to use. The primary assay endpoint selected was the enzyme-specific IgG1 titer det ermined by an Alcalase-specific ELISA. This is not the primary allerge nic antibody in mice (IgE is); however, IgG1 is coregulated with IgE v ia the IL-4/TH2 pathway and may have a role in mediating allergic-type responses. BDF1 mice (C57B1/6 X DBA/2) were selected as representativ e of high responder strains, with high response associated with the H- 2(b) (C57B1/6) parent. The dosing regimen used for most studies incorp orated three i.n. exposures (Days 1, 3, and 10) and bleeding of the an imals on Day 15. The animals were anesthetized and then immunized by a llowing them to inhale 5-mu l aliquots of dosing solution into each no stril at each immunization. Positioning of the animals with their head s down (vs up) may have allowed more of the dosing solution to remain in the nasal region for a slightly longer period of time, but did not change the eventual GI tract migration and excretion of each dose. The presence of a detergent matrix in the enzyme dosing solution enhanced the IgG1 response. Immunizing with enzyme plus detergent gave highly consistent dose-response curves for Alcalase when evaluated over many studies. An enzyme-specific allergic antibody (IgE) response was weak and inconsistent under the dosing regimen used to generate the IgG1 re sponse, but was stronger with longer-term dosing, consistent with the delay in IgE vs IgG1 responses seen in some other studies. Using IgG1 as a surrogate for allergic sensitization, we have preliminary data sh owing similar differential potencies between Alcalase and other test e nzymes as detected in previous GPIT tests. On the basis of these data, we believe the i.n. immunization/IgG1 response model is a robust tech nique that may be useful in determining the relative immunogenicities of detergent enzymes and other proteins. (C) 1996 Society of Toxicolog y.