Insider trading was the subject of extensive political debate from 198
9 through to 1991, culminating in substantial amendments to the Corpor
ations Law. The political climate for this legislative action was infl
uenced by a high profile empirical study by Tomasic and Pentony assert
ing that insider trading was both widespread and harmful. This study i
s critically appraised with respect to a number of methodological issu
es and in particular, questions are raised as to whether the inference
s drawn from the evidence are justifiable. Alternative methods for emp
irical research into the insider trading phenomenon are noted.