In this article, we provide a brief review and a critique of behaviora
l consultation (BC; Bergan & Kratochwill, 1990). Specifically, the pro
cedures utilized within BC for assessment of the problem, development
of an intervention, implementation of the intervention, and plan evalu
ation are overly reliant on indirect methods of behavior assessment an
d behavior change. Furthermore, there is no conclusive evidence that t
alking with teachers, using the methods advocated in BC, leads to chan
ges in teacher behavior that in turn are linked to changes in child be
havior. A behavior analytic model for development and implementation o
f interventions in the classroom is contrasted with BC. Finally, probl
ems associated with other models of consultation are discussed.