B. Dujardin et al., THE VALUE OF MATERNAL HEIGHT AS A RISK FACTOR OF DYSTOCIA - A METAANALYSIS, TM & IH. Tropical medicine & international health, 1(4), 1996, pp. 510-521
Ten publications and studies on the relation between maternal height a
nd the risk of dystocia due to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) are a
nalysed. The rate of Caesarean sections was chosen as the CPD indicato
r. When maternal height is presented in percentiles, curves can be sup
erimposed, and sensitivities and specificities of the various studies
may be analysed together. One biased study was excluded; the remaining
9 were pooled and regression lines calculated for sensitivity (Se) an
d specificity (Sp) of the entire set of points. The resulting model, i
.e. Se=10.9+1.99 Y and Sp=99.9 - 0.99 Y, permits easy calculation of t
he expected sensitivity and specificity for each percentile Y. When th
e frequency of Caesarean section due to CPD is known, positive and neg
ative predictive values can also be calculated. The proposed formulas
can also be used to determine confidence intervals. The findings in te
rms of the sensitivity and specificity of low maternal height as a ris
k factor for dystocia indicate that I out of 5 pregnant women would ha
ve to be referred for further investigation to identify half of the ca
ses of mechanical dystocia necessitating Caesarean section. The predic
tive value for a Caesarean rate of 2% (a value often seen in developin
g countries) for this 20th percentile would be only 5%. Practical ways
of choosing a reference criterion are suggested. A two-track strategy
(antenatal check-ups and community monitoring) is proposed.