B. Heintz et al., BIOAVAILABILITY OF 2 VERAPAMIL FORMULATIO NS FOLLOWING REPEATED ADMINISTRATION UNDER STEADY CONDITIONS - AN OPEN 2-PERIOD CROSS-OVER STUDY, Arzneimittel-Forschung, 46(11), 1996, pp. 1060-1063
The relative bioavailability of a new formulation of verapamil (CAS 52
-53-9, Veramex(R) 40) in comparison to a standard formulation was inve
stigate in an open two-period cross-over study in 16 healthy volunteer
s under steady state conditions of verapamil a selective HPLC-method w
as used with fluorescence detection after direct injection and enrichm
ent by column switching enabling a simultaneous separation and analysi
s of verapamil and N-norverapamil. The bioavailability was estimated u
sing areas under the concentration-time curves (AUC), maximum serum co
ncentrations (C-max) and peak-trough fluctuation (PTF). Bioequivalence
was tested calculating the 90% confidence intervals (ANOVA(log)). The
mean verapamil plasma profile after the test substance was up to 1.5
h slightly lower than the corresponding curve after the reference subs
tance, thereafter slightly higher plasma levels up to 7 h were observe
d after the test substance. The individual plasma profiles had a simil
ar variance, and hardly any difference was discernible between the two
drugs. A similar behaviour was also seen for N-norverapamil. A mean r
elative bioavailability of 101% was observed after the test substance
both for verapamil and N-norverapamil. The mean maximum plasma concent
rations for verapamil and N-verapamil were 50.0 and 50.3 ng/ml. The PT
F-values for verapamil adn N-norverapamil were 178 and 76.6% after the
test substance and 182 and 79.6% after the standard formulation, resp
ectively. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC, C(max) and PTF for ver
apamil and N-norverapamil are completely within the accepted range of
80 to 125% for AUC, C-max and PTF. Therefore bioequivalence between bo
th formulations can be stated.