U. Carlsson et al., HEPATITIS-A VACCINATION BY INTRACUTANEOUS LOW-DOSE ADMINISTRATION - ALESS EXPENSIVE ALTERNATIVE, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 28(5), 1996, pp. 435-438
We investigated the immune response to three different intracutaneous
(i.c.) doses of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: 72, 144, and 216 ELIS
A units (EU). The response was measured using a quotient score derived
from a Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (HAVAB Abbott) an
d translated to IU per liter using a World Health Organization standar
d serum for hepatitis A virus antibody, The results were compared with
the results obtained after an intramuscular (i.m.) full dose, i.e. 1,
440 EU, at 0 and 6-12 months. As estimated from antibody concentration
, 3 lots of 144 EU i.c. with 100% or two lots of 216 EU i.c. with 98%
seroconversion results in at least as goad early protection as the sta
ndard immunization with one lot of 1,440 EU i.m., (79% with our method
), Indeed, only two doses of 144 EU vaccine (90% seroconversion) seem
to give results comparable to the standard procedure. After the booste
r dose the median antibody concentration is 1,290 IU/I for the 144 EU
vaccine and 837 for the 216 EU one, compared with an antibody response
of 990 IU/I for the standard 1,440 EU i.m, vaccination. In conclusion
, three doses of 144 EU vaccine i.c, or, as an alternative, two doses
of 216 EU at monthly intervals give good early protection (e.g, before
travel). After the booster dose, which is given 6 months to I year la
ter, the serological response is comparable to the standard procedure
of two doses of the 1,440 EU vaccine given i.m. and with 100% seroconv
ersion in all three programs.