The aim of our study was to evaluate the correlation between skin thic
kness and bone mass with a view to eventually using this parameter as
a clinical screening tool to identify women with possible low bone mas
s in whom a more costly diagnostic test, such as x-ray radiometry, sho
uld be performed. One hundred and ten women who were scheduled for ost
eodensitometry were invited to participate. Skin thickness was measure
d with a mechanical calliper. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured
at the lumbar spine (L2-4) and at the femoral neck levels by dual ener
gy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The Pearson's correlation coefficient o
btained between skin thickness and lumbar spine BMD was 0.37 (p = 0.00
01); between skin thickness and femoral BMD it was 0.33 (p = 0.001). T
he correlation coefficient between skin thickness and age was -0.35 Ca
= 0.0001) and between skin thickness and body mass index was 0.30 (p
= 0.002). The correlation coefficient between BMD values obtained at t
he femoral and lumbar levels was 0.74 (p = 0.0001). In addition to our
results, we present a summary of the data available in the literature
on the correlation observed between skin thickness/collagen content a
nd bone density. The coefficient of correlation varies greatly among t
hese studies and is not consistently statistically significant. These
differences can be explained by the methodologies used by the differen
t authors. Although skin thickness cannot replace BMD in identifying w
omen with low bone mass in whom estrogen replacement therapy is indica
ted, we think that skin thickness may become a helpful tool in screeni
ng women. Further research is needed before clinical recommendations a
re given.