Kd. Shelbourne et al., CLASSIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ARTHROFIBROSIS OF THE KNEE AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION, American journal of sports medicine, 24(6), 1996, pp. 857-862
We report 72 patients with disabling knee arthrofibrosis who were trea
ted at our clinic. All patients had painful restriction of extension o
r limitation of both extension and flexion that had persisted despite
physical therapy. The level of arthrofibrosis was categorized into one
of four types: Type 1 (25 patients), < 10 degrees extension loss and
normal flexion; Type 2 (16 patients), > 10 degrees extension loss and
normal flexion; Type 3 (15 patients), > 10 degrees extension loss and
> 25 degrees flexion loss with a tight patella; and Type 4 (16 patient
s), > 10 degrees extension loss, 30 degrees or more flexion loss, and
patella infera with marked patellar tightness. All patients were treat
ed with outpatient arthroscopic surgery. Anterior scar resection down
to the proximal tibia was required for all patients with Types 2, 3, a
nd 4 arthrofibrosis. Notchplasty was performed when necessary. Medial
and lateral capsular releases and knee manipulation were required for
patients with Type 3 or 4 arthrofibrosis. Postoperatively, all patient
s with Types 2, 3, and 4 arthrofibrosis were treated with outpatient s
erial extension casting. At the time of latest followup (28 to 115 mon
ths), the mean improvement of range of motion was as follows: Type 1,
7 degrees of extension; Type 2, 14 degrees of extension; Type 3, 13 de
grees of extension and 28 degrees of flexion; and Type 4, 18 degrees o
f extension and 27 degrees of flexion. Improvement was also found for
the mean stiffness, self-evaluation, functional activity, and Noyes kn
ee scores in all groups.