H. Schmitz et al., ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY OF INSECT FLIGHT-MUSCLE IN RIGOR AND AMPPNP AT 23-DEGREES-C, Journal of Molecular Biology, 264(2), 1996, pp. 279-301
Treatment of rigor fibers of insect flight muscle (IFM) with AMPPNP at
23 degrees C causes a 70% drop in tension with little change in stiff
ness. In order to visualize the changes in crossbridge conformation an
d distribution that give rise to the mechanical response, we have prod
uced three-dimensional reconstructions by tomography of both rigor and
AMPPNP-treated muscle that do not average the repeating motifs of cro
ssbridges, and thereby retain information on variability of crossbridg
e structure and distribution. Tomograms can be averaged when display o
f only the regular features is wanted. Tomograms of rigor IFM show dou
ble-headed lead and single-headed rear crossbridges. Tomograms of IFM
treated with AMPPNP at 23 degrees C reveal many double-headed and some
single-headed ''lead'' bridges but few crossbridges corresponding to
the rear bridges of rigor. Instead, new non-rigor forms of variably an
gled crossbridges are found bound to actin sites not labeled with myos
in heads in rigor. This indicates that the rear bridges of rigor have
redistributed during the transition from rigor to the AMPPNP state, wh
ich could explain the maintenance of rigor stiffness despite the loss
of tension. Comparison of in situ crossbridges in tomograms of rigor w
ith atomic model of acto-S1, the complex formed by myosin subfragment
1 and actin, reveals that the regulatory domain of S1 would require si
gnificant bending and realignment to fit into both types of rigor cros
sbridges. The modifications are particularly significant for the rear
bridges and suggest that differential strain in the regulatory domain
of rear bridges may be the basis for their detachment and redistributi
on upon binding AMPPNP. Similar comparison using lead-type crossbridge
s in AMPPNP reveals departures from the rigor acto-S1 atomic. model th
at include azimuthal straightening and a slight M-ward bending in the
regulatory domain. Both the motor and regulatory domains of the new no
n-rigor crossbridges differ from those in the atomic model of acto-SZ.
A new crossbridge motif identified in AMPPNP-treated muscle consists
of paired rigor-like and non-rigor crossbridges and suggests possible
transitions in the myosin working stroke. (C) 1996 Academic Press Limi
ted