PREDICTING SOIL-WATER PARTITION-COEFFICIENTS FOR CADMIUM

Citation
Sz. Lee et al., PREDICTING SOIL-WATER PARTITION-COEFFICIENTS FOR CADMIUM, Environmental science & technology, 30(12), 1996, pp. 3418-3424
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Environmental
ISSN journal
0013936X
Volume
30
Issue
12
Year of publication
1996
Pages
3418 - 3424
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-936X(1996)30:12<3418:PSPFC>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Equilibrium batch measurements were made of the adsorption of Cd(II) o n 15 New Jersey soils. The soils were characterized in terms of surfac e properties and chemical composition, particularly organic matter and metal oxides. The adsorption of Cd(II) followed the Langmuir relation and increased with increasing pH between pH 3 and pH 10. At constant pH and metal concentration, greater adsorption was observed for soils with higher organic matter content. To better understand the mechanism of adsorption, the experimental results for the adsorption of Cd by t he 15 soils were tested using a partition coefficient model that relat ed the adsorption of the Cd(II) to the soil components: organic matter , iron oxides, aluminum oxides, and manganese oxides. This model was n ot successful when applied to measurements at the natural soil pH beca use of the competition of protons with Cd(II) for available sites. How ever, at constant pH, partition coefficients obtained from experimenta l data were highly correlated with those calculated for a partition co efficient between Cd(II) and organic matter alone. Normalization of th e partition coefficients, K-d, for the organic matter content of the s oils, K-om, greatly improved the relationship between the partition co efficient and pH (R(2) increased from 0.799 to 0.927). This suggests t hat the surficial adsorption sites are principally composed of organic matter. For the 24-h equilibration period employed, diffusion of Cd(I I) through this superficial organic matter coating to underlying sorpt ive materials, including metal oxides, is unimportant in the partition ing of Cd(II).