F. Ankelsimons et Jm. Cummins, MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT MITOCHONDRIA AND MAMMALIAN FERTILIZATION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIES ON HUMAN-EVOLUTION, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 93(24), 1996, pp. 13859-13863
In vertebrates, inheritance of mitochondria is thought to be predomina
ntly maternal, and mitochondrial DNA analysis has become a standard ta
xonomic tool. In accordance with the prevailing view of strict materna
l inheritance, many sources assert that during fertilization, the sper
m tail, with its mitochondria, gets excluded from the embryo. This is
incorrect. In the majority of mammals-including humans-the midpiece mi
tochondria can be identified in the embryo even though their ultimate
fate is unknown, The ''missing mitochondria'' story seems to have surv
ived-and proliferated-unchallenged in a time of contention between hyp
otheses of human origins, because it supports the ''African Eve'' mode
l of recent radiation of Homo sapiens out of Africa. We will discuss t
he infiltration of this mistake into concepts of mitochondrial inherit
ance and human evolution.