EVALUATION OF THE TOPEX POSEIDON ALTIMETER SYSTEM OVER THE GREAT-LAKES/

Authors
Citation
Cs. Morris et Sk. Gill, EVALUATION OF THE TOPEX POSEIDON ALTIMETER SYSTEM OVER THE GREAT-LAKES/, J GEO RES-O, 99(C12), 1994, pp. 24527-24539
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
ISSN journal
21699275 → ACNP
Volume
99
Issue
C12
Year of publication
1994
Pages
24527 - 24539
Database
ISI
SICI code
2169-9275(1994)99:C12<24527:EOTTPA>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter measurement system is evaluated for the f irst 46 repeat cycles (September 23, 1992-December 23, 1993) using tra cks over the Great Lakes. The temporal variations in lake level are re moved from the altimeter measurements using in situ lake level measure ments, thus permitting the performance of the altimeter system to be a ssessed. For the NASA altimeter, the root-mean-square (RMS) scatter of the residuals is 3.95 cm using all the tracks over the lakes. However , some of the scatter in this result is probably due to lake tides or seiche, which can amount to a few centimeters amplitude near the ends of the lakes. When the seven best tracks are used, which cross the cen ter of the lakes where tides/seiche effects are minimal, the RMS error is reduced to either 2.9 or 3.0 cm, depending on whether the Centre N ational d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) or NASA orbit is used. This places a n upper limit on the error budget of the altimeter system, excluding o cean tides and inverse barometer effect. There are several short-perio d variations in the residuals. The most pronounced is a 55-day period, with a 1-cm amplitude, which we believe is (at least in part) due to orbit error. When the model-derived wet tropospheric correction is sub stituted for the TOPEX microwave radiometer correction, the RMS error increases significantly, possibly resulting in an annual cycle of a fe w centimeters. Evaluation of the ionospheric correction indicates that the dual-frequency correction provides an average improvement of 0.85 cm over the Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by s atellite (DORIS) correction. Although there are insufficient data to d irectly assess the CNES altimeter, the relative bias between the altim eters is estimated to be either -14.3 or -15.6 cm (NASA altimeter meas uring short), depending on whether the DORIS or dual-frequency ionosph eric correction is applied to the NASA altimeter.