Mb. Lupfer et al., EXPLAINING LIFE-ALTERING OCCURRENCES - A TEST OF THE GOD-OF-THE-GAPS HYPOTHESIS, Journal for the scientific study of religion, 35(4), 1996, pp. 379-391
This experiment extends the growing literature aimed at identifying th
e conditions that impel people to make religious attributions. A total
of 177 subjects were presented a series of 16 vignettes after each of
which they provided an attributional analysis. The event depicted in
each vignette was either (a) an action or occurrence having (b) a posi
tive or negative outcome that was (c) life-altering or non-life-alteri
ng. Subjects selected their attributions from a menu that included rel
igious causal agents (God, Satan), several naturalistic causes (e.g.,
the protagonist's characteristics, other actors), and nonreligious-sup
ernaturalistic causes (fate, luck). As predicted attributions to God w
ere most commonly made when the event was a life-altering occurrence h
aving positive consequences. Attributions to Satan, rarely made, were
prompted by life-altering events having negative consequences. As for
whether subjects exhibited a ''God-of-the-gaps'' pattern of causal rea
soning, the evidence was mixed but tended to support the conclusion th
at they did not.