THE EFFECT OF HYPOTHERMIA AND HYPERTHERMIA ON PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY OFNORMAL BRAIN

Citation
Mo. Dereski et al., THE EFFECT OF HYPOTHERMIA AND HYPERTHERMIA ON PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY OFNORMAL BRAIN, Neurosurgery, 36(1), 1995, pp. 141-145
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0148396X
Volume
36
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
141 - 145
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-396X(1995)36:1<141:TEOHAH>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
THE EFFECT OF whole body hyperthermia and hypothermia in conjunction w ith photodynamic therapy (PDT) was determined on normal rat brain. Hyp erthermia animals (Group I, n = 18) were warmed until their core body temperature reached 40 degrees C, (brain temperature, 39.7 +/- 0.5 deg rees C) and maintained at 40 +/- 1 degrees C for 30 minutes prior to a nd after PDT. Hypothermia (Group II, n = 31) animals were cooled to 30 +/- 1 degrees C (brain temperature, 29.3 +/- 0.4 degrees C) for 1 hou r. PDT treatment was performed, and the body temperature of the animal s was maintained at 30 degrees C for 2 hours post-PDT. A population of animals was subjected to PDT under normothermic (Group III, n = 16; b ody temperature, 37 +/- 1 degrees C; brain temperature, 36.7 +/- 0.8 d egrees C) conditions and treated in a manner identical to that of hype rthermic animals. PDT was performed with 17 J/cm(2), 35 J/cm(2) or 70 J/cm(2) (100 mW/cm(2)). Photofrin (Quad- ralogic Technologies Ltd., Va ncouver, Canada) (12.5 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 48 hours prior to laser treatment on all three groups. Wet-dry weight measureme nts were obtained on a separate set of all three groups of animals (n = 27). Cortical lesion depths were measured, and pathological evaluati on was made at 24 hours post-PDT. No difference in the wet-dry weight measurements or histopathology was present between the th ree groups o f animals. Lesion depths for Group I animals did not significantly dif fer from Group III animals. However, lesion depths in Group II animals at 17, 35, and 70 J/cm(2) were significantly less than those for Grou p III animals at these energy levels. These results suggest that in vi vo, mild hyperthermia does not influence normal brain PDT damage and t hat hypothermia may reduce damage to normal brain from PDT.