S. Daya et al., THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ALLOGENEIC LEUKOCYTE IMMUNIZATION IN UNEXPLAINEDPRIMARY RECURRENT SPONTANEOUS-ABORTION, American journal of reproductive immunology [1989], 32(4), 1994, pp. 294-302
PROBLEM: Unexplained primary recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) can
be viewed as a partner-specific problem for which immunization with al
logeneic leukocytes is being offered as therapy. Published data from r
andomized controlled trials have produced conflicting results regardin
g treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study was to perform a subg
roup analysis of the data from a recent worldwide collaborative meta-a
nalysis using the raw data for patients with primary RSA entered into
randomized controlled trials of immunotherapy. METHODS: Data from rand
omized controlled trials in eight centers were included in this analys
is. Individual patients were included only if they had had three or mo
re spontaneous abortions, no previous pregnancy beyond 20 weeks' gesta
tion, no identifiable cause for the abortions, and no evidence of anti
paternal antibodies. Meta-analysis by centre and logistic regression a
nalysis were performed to determine the overall effect of treatment in
achieving live birth and to identify variables that affect the progno
sis for a successful outcome. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis by center,
immunotherapy significantly improved the live birth rate (common odds
ratio = 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.20 to 3.12). In the an
alysis by patient, the likelihood of a successful outcome was also sig
nificantly better with treatment (relative risk = 1.46, 95% CI 1.19 to
1.69). The absolute treatment effect was 16.3% producing a number nee
ded to treat of 6. The number of previous abortions had a significant
negative correlation with live birth rate, such that for each addition
al pregnancy loss beyond three, the likelihood of live birth was reduc
ed by 23%. CONCLUSION: Allogeneic leukocyte immunization is an effecti
ve treatment for unexplained primary RSA when pretreatment antipaterna
l antibodies are absent. Better diagnostic tests are required to ident
ify patients who may derive maximal benefit from this therapeutic appr
oach.