A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK CLASSIFIERS FOR EDDY-CURRENT SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION

Citation
Mt. Shyamsunder et al., A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK CLASSIFIERS FOR EDDY-CURRENT SIGNAL CLASSIFICATION, Insight, 37(1), 1995, pp. 26-30
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Instument & Instrumentation","Materials Science, Characterization & Testing
Journal title
ISSN journal
13542575
Volume
37
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
26 - 30
Database
ISI
SICI code
1354-2575(1995)37:1<26:ACOCAA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A series of eddy current signal trajectories have been obtained on art ificial round and rectangular defects in thin stainless steel plates. These signals have been processed to achieve a single waveform charact erising the eddy current trajectories from which a large number of fea tures have been derived both in the time and frequency domains. The op timised number of features to characterise a defect has been ascertain ed with the help of four reported conventional classifiers and an Arti ficial Neural Network (ANN) classifier. A comparative assessment of th e potential of these classifiers has been carried out within the domai n of the given signal trainings in this investigation. The results ind icate that only five signal features are sufficient to gain an underst anding about the nature of defect.