CHARACTERIZATION OF ANATOMIC COMMUNICATIONS AMONG THE ANTEBRACHIOCARPAL, MIDDLE CARPAL, AND CARPOMETACARPAL JOINTS IN CATTLE, USING INTRAARTICULAR LATEX, POSITIVE-CONTRAST ARTHROGRAPHY, AND FLUOROSCOPY
A. Desrochers et al., CHARACTERIZATION OF ANATOMIC COMMUNICATIONS AMONG THE ANTEBRACHIOCARPAL, MIDDLE CARPAL, AND CARPOMETACARPAL JOINTS IN CATTLE, USING INTRAARTICULAR LATEX, POSITIVE-CONTRAST ARTHROGRAPHY, AND FLUOROSCOPY, American journal of veterinary research, 58(1), 1997, pp. 7-10
Objective-To evaluate the frequency and sites of communication among t
he antebrachiocarpal, middle carpal, and carpometacarpal joints in cat
tle. Animals-137 limbs were obtained from 72 fresh bovine cadavers sub
mitted for necropsy because of problems unrelated to the carpus. Proce
dure-1 of the 3 injection sites was randomly assigned to both carpi of
each ox, and a mixture of latex and barium sulfate was injected into
the joint. Communication between 2 or more joints was determined by th
e presence of latex and contrast material in a joint adjacent to the i
njected joint by examination of frozen sections, positive-contrast art
hrography, and fluoroscopy. Results-Communication existed among the 3
joints in 18 specimens (13.1%). The middle carpal joint and the carpom
etacarpal joint always communicated. The antebrachiocarpal joint commu
nicated with the middle carpal joint between the ulnar and intermediat
e carpal bones. The middle carpal and carpometacarpal joints always co
mmunicated between the fourth and fused second and third carpal bones.
In a few specimens, additional sites of communication were identified
at the palmar aspect of the fourth carpal bone and the fused second a
nd third carpal bones. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-individual a
natomic Variation of the carpus in cattle should be considered when di
agnostic or treatment protocols are established.