Although the public has grown increasingly accustomed to consolidation
in the health care industry, the announcement on December 8, 1993, th
at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and the Brigham and Women'
s Hospital would merge merited front page coverage across the nation.
These hospitals, long considered the crown jewels of the Harvard Medic
al School, have a history rich irt tradition and a reputation for fier
ce independence. The merged entity, subsequently named Partners Health
care System, Inc., has a payroll of 17,500 employees, making it the la
rgest employer lit Boston and the third largest in Massachusetts. Shor
tly after the merger; Boston newspapers reported that the announced pl
ait had circumvented plans for Harvard to merge all five of its major
teaching hospitals. The MGH-Brigham merger included no provisions for
the other three Harvard-affiliated hospitals, the Massachusetts Deacon
ess, the Beth Israel, or the Dana Farber Cancer Institute. Speculation
that the move was accomplished with little input from Harvard Medical
School Dean Daniel Tosteson further accentuated the delicate politics
of the merger. To run this powerhouse of health care, teaching, and r
esearch, the directors of Partners turned to Dr Samuel O. Thier. Thier
who had honed his leadership skills as Medicine Chairman at Yale and
President of the Institute of Medicine (IOM), has lifelong ties to the
MGH. Indeed during his recent tenure as President of Brandeis Univers
ity, he still made rounds at the hospital. Largely credited with revit
alizing the IOM and restoring financial health to Brandeis, Thier must
now lead as entity playing in a quickly changing and unpredictable ma
rketplace. Interviewed in his modest office located off a busy hallway
near the main entrance to the MGH Thier reflected on the controversy
surrounding the merger, the relationship with other Harvard hospitals,
and the state of academic medicine in this country.