MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS VERSUS HYBRID IONOMER COMPOSITE SANDWICH RESTORATIONS/

Citation
Kh. Friedl et al., MARGINAL ADAPTATION OF COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS VERSUS HYBRID IONOMER COMPOSITE SANDWICH RESTORATIONS/, Operative dentistry, 22(1), 1997, pp. 21-29
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
03617734
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
21 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-7734(1997)22:1<21:MAOCRV>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the approximal marginal quality of composite fillings using a dentin bonding system to the mar ginal quality of hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Forty -eight standardized class 2 cavity preparations were prepared in carie s-free, human third molars. Twelve preparations at a time were filled either with a composite using the matching dentin bonding system, SZ ( Scotchbond MP/Z100) or PP (PROBOND/Prisma TPH) or with hybrid ionomer/ composite sandwich fillings VZ (Vitremer/Z100) or DP (Dyract/Prisma TP H). Margins were evaluated before and after thermomechanical loading ( TCML) (5000 cycles [+5 degrees C/+55 degrees C], 72.5 N [1,7 Hz]) by q uantitative scanning electron microscope analysis using an image analy zing system. Furthermore, microleakage was assessed by dye penetration before and after TCML. Statistical analysis was performed using the M ann-Whitney test at the 0.05 level of significance. SEM analysis after TCML showed significantly fewer marginal gaps at the material/dentin interface with VZ (2.2%), DP (7.3%), and PP (6.0%) compared to SZ (29. 6%). After TCML, SZ showed significantly more marginal gaps at the mat erial/dentin interface, whereas VZ, DP, and PP were not susceptible to TCML. PP showed the highest percentage in marginal swelling before (1 8.2%) and after TCML (15.9%), while VZ showed no marginal swelling at all. VZ showed significantly fewer marginal gaps at the composite/hybr id ionomer interface than DP. After TCML there was no significant diff erence in marginal gaps between the hybrid ionomer/enamel and the hybr id ionomer/dentin interface for both Vitremer and Dyract. Using the sa ndwich technique the Z100/enamel interface had significantly more marg inal gaps than all other composite/enamel interfaces after TCML. There was no significant difference in microleakage between the test groups at the material/dentin interface. SEM analysis and dye penetration sh owed that hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations have good mar ginal qualities and may be an alternative to composite restorations us ing a dentin bonding system.