G. Castanedahernandez et al., DIFFERENCES IN NIFEDIPINE CONCENTRATION-EFFECT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAPSULE AND SLOW-RELEASE TABLET ADMINISTRATION, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 33(1), 1995, pp. 56-60
The relationships between nifedipine plasma concentrations and its hyp
otensive and positive chronotropic effects were studied in healthy vol
unteers who received either a 10 mg capsule (CAP) or a 20 mg slow rele
ase tablet (SRT). Plasma concentrations rose more rapidly after CAP th
an after SRT, C-max being 131+/-39 and 40+/-7 ng/ml and t(max) being 0
.5+/-0.07 and 1.8+/-0.4 h, respectively. Both formulations produced a
reduction in diastolic blood pressure which exhibited a significant li
near correlation (p < 0.01) with nifedipine plasma concentration. Howe
ver, the slope obtained with SRT was significantly higher than that of
CAP (0.24+/-0.05 vs 0.07+/-0.01,p < 0.01). That is, a similar hypoten
sive effect was produced at a lower concentration with SRT than with C
AP. A positive chronotropic effect which exhibited a highly significan
t correlation with nifedipine plasma concentration (p < 0.0001) was ob
served with CAP. Conversely, with SRT heart rate increase was smaller
and there was no significant correlation with nifedipine plasma concen
tration (p > 0.45). Since the measured decrease in blood pressure is t
he outcome of nifedipine-induced vasodilation and of homeostatic respo
nses, results are interpreted as follows. Fast nifedipine input after
CAP induced a brisk change in physiological conditions and hence trigg
ered an important homeostatic response, visualized as heart rate incre
ase, which partially offset the hypotensive effect. With SRT, there wa
s a gradual change in blood pressure producing lesser activation of co
mpensatory mechanisms and therefore the hypotensive effect of nifedipi
ne was less antagonized than with CAP. Nifedipine SRT does not only ex
hibit pharmacokinetic advantages, but also a more favorable pharmacody
namic profile than CAP.