Flours from a sample of hard red winter (HRW) wheat and spelt wheat we
re evaluated for milling, baking and nutritional qualities. Milling fl
our yield from the spelt wheat sample was consistently lower than from
the corresponding HRW wheat sample, pup leaves made with spelt flour
also showed lower volume and total scores. Both wheat grains tested po
sitive for gluten and, thus, would be unsuitable for gluten-intolerant
individuals. With one exception (higher zinc content), spelt wheat gr
ain did not differ significantly from HRW wheat in the contents of nut
ritionally important components-protein, fiber, minerals and vitamins.
Expressed on g/100g protein basis, all amino acids, except tyrosine,
aspartic acid and methionine, were lower (lysine by 28%) in spelt whea
t as compared to HRW wheat. The protein efficiency ratios of spelt and
HRW wheat grain measured 1.3 and 1.4 (casein, 2.5) and protein digest
ibilities 80.1% and 78.9% (casein, 91.6%), respectively. Thus, the sup
erior nutritional content and other claims that have been suggested fo
r spelt wheat may be unfounded.