In recent studies of a 3 1/2km borehole near Cajon Pass we showed that
the observed high heat flow and its sharp decrease with depth are pre
dictable effects of independently determined erosion history, topograp
hy, and radioactivity, leaving little room for the large contribution
from frictional heat required by conventional faulting models for the
nearby San Andreas fault. We have since discovered an error in our ana
lysis that lowers the predicted surface heat flow from the upper end (
similar to 100 mW/m(2)) to the lower end (similar to 90 mW/m(2)) of th
e range of measurement uncertainty at this complex site; it permits, b
ut does not require, a source increment of up to 10 mW/m(2) not accoun
ted for in the prediction. Better agreement between the prediction and
observations at depth confines the permissible extra heat flow to the
upper part of the hole, making it difficult to attribute it to a deep
frictional source. In any case, however, such a frictional source wou
ld be too small to attribute to conventional high-strength faulting mo
dels, and the basic conclusion of the original study is unchanged. The
most likely cause of the relatively small discrepancy between predict
ed and observed heat flow (if it exists) is preferential three-dimensi
onal flow into the higher-thermal conductivity rock that occupies the
upper part of the borehole.