U. Arnason et al., PATTERN AND TIMING OF EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCES AMONG HOMINOIDS BASED ON ANALYSES OF COMPLETE MTDNAS, Journal of molecular evolution, 43(6), 1996, pp. 650-661
We have examined and dated primate divergences by applying a newly est
ablished molecular/paleontological reference, the evolutionary separat
ion between artiodactyls and cetaceans anchored at 60 million years be
fore present (MYBP). Owing to the morphological transformations coinci
ding with the transition from terrestrial to aquatic (marine) life and
the large body size of the animals (which makes their fossils easier
to fmd), this reference can be defined, paleontologically, within much
narrower time limits compared to any local primate calibration marker
hitherto applied for dating hominoid divergences. Application of the
artiodactyl/cetacean reference (A/C-60) suggests that hominoid diverge
nces took place much earlier than has been concluded previously. Accor
ding to a homogenous-rate model of sequence evolution, the primary hom
inoid divergence, i.e., that between the families Hylobatidae (gibbons
) and Hominidae, was dated at approximate to 36 MYBP. The correspondin
g dating for the divergence between Pongo (orangutan) and Gorilla-Pan
(chimpanzee) -Homo is approximate to 24.5 MYBP, that for Gorilla vs Ho
me-Pan is approximate to 18 MYBP, and that for Homo vs Pan approximate
to 13.5 MYBP. The split between Sumatran and Bornean orangutans was d
ated at approximate to 10.5 MYBP and that between the common and pygmy
chimpanzees at approximate to 7 MYBP. Analyses of a single gene (cyto
chrome b) suggest that the divergence within the Catarrhini, i.e., bet
ween Hominoidea and Old World monkeys (Cercopithecoidea), took place >
40 MYBP; that within the Anthropoidea, i.e., between Catarrhini and Pl
atyrrhini (New World monkeys), >60 MYBP; and that between Anthropoidea
and Prosimii (lemur), approximate to 80 MYBP. These separation times
are about two times more ancient than those applied previously as refe
rences for the dating of hominoid divergences. The present findings au
tomatically imply a much slower evolution in hominoid DNA (both mitoch
ondrial and nuclear) than commonly recognized.