EFFECTS OF A GRAZING PERIOD ON PERFORMANCE OF FINISHING BULLS - COMPARISON WITH AN INDOOR FINISHING SYSTEM

Citation
I. Dufrasne et al., EFFECTS OF A GRAZING PERIOD ON PERFORMANCE OF FINISHING BULLS - COMPARISON WITH AN INDOOR FINISHING SYSTEM, Animal Science, 60, 1995, pp. 75-80
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience","Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13577298
Volume
60
Year of publication
1995
Part
1
Pages
75 - 80
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-7298(1995)60:<75:EOAGPO>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
A comparison was made between two different finishing systems with Bel gian Blue bulls. Two groups of bulls were grazed during an initial 140 -day period and then finished indoors with concentrates. There were tw o stocking rates during the grazing period: a medium at six bulls per ha (MGFI) and a high at eight bulls per ha (HGFI). A third group of bu lls was finished indoors on a concentrate diet during the whole finish ing period (FI). The experiment was repeated over 2 years consecutivel y. The pasture which was grazed at the medium stocking rate was charac terized by a higher sward height (P < 0.01), more refusals (P < 0.001) , less Lolium perenne (P < 0.05) and more Trifolium repens (P < 0.05) than that grazed at eight bulls per ha. The live-weight gain was 1.15 kg/day during the grazing period for the MGFI bulls and 1.00 kg/day wh en they were taken indoors. The increase in stocking rate reduced the gain at grass (1.00 kg/day, P < 0.001) and improved the gain indoors ( 1.24 v. 1.01 kg/day, P < 0.001). In the groups which were initially gr azed when compared with the indoor system, the fattening period was lo nger (236.0 and 241.0 v. 186.9 days, P < 0.01) and the live-weight gai n lower (1.11 and 1.10 v. 1.44 kg/day, P < 0.001 for MGFI, HGFI and FI respectively). The dressing proportion was greater also (P < 0.05), a nd there were higher concentrations of muscles (P < 0.05) and bones (P < 0.05) in the carcass of the bulls which were grazed initially. With these bulls, the lean meat was darker (P < 0.05) and lost more water although there were no effects on the myoglobin content or on shear fo rce. The net profit was in favour of the groups which were grazed.