Gm. Bosticardo et S. Alloatti, AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CLASSICAL UREA KINETIC-MODEL AND DIRECT DIALYSIS QUANTIFICATION - IMPORTANCE OF UREA REBOUND, Nephron, 74(4), 1996, pp. 674-679
From a review of the literature regarding kinetic models used for asse
ssing the adequacy of hemodialysis, no definite conclusions can be dra
wn as to whether the classical urea kinetic model (UKM) or modified di
rect dialysis quantification (mDDQ) is more reliable. We compared mDDQ
with classical UKM and with a modified UKM that employs an equilibrat
ed urea value. From the theoretical viewpoint, no substantial conflict
is found between the two models as regards the dialysis dose, if urea
rebound is considered. From the practical viewpoint, in our opinion d
irect quantification lends itself better for experimental purposes whe
reas for routine K-t/V evaluation UKM is easier and accurate enough, p
rovided that rebound is taken into account.