COMPARISON OF INCORPORATION AND EXTENSION OF NUCLEOTIDES IN-VITRO OPPOSITE 8-HYDROXYGUANINE (7,8-DIHYDRO-8-OXOGUANINE) IN HOT-SPOTS OF THE C-HA-RAS GENE
H. Kamiya et al., COMPARISON OF INCORPORATION AND EXTENSION OF NUCLEOTIDES IN-VITRO OPPOSITE 8-HYDROXYGUANINE (7,8-DIHYDRO-8-OXOGUANINE) IN HOT-SPOTS OF THE C-HA-RAS GENE, Japanese journal of cancer research, 86(3), 1995, pp. 270-276
DNA templates with 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine, oh(8)Gu
a) at a site corresponding to the first or second position of codon 12
of the c-Ha-ras gene were prepared, and the nucleotides inserted oppo
site the modified base were compared. The Klenow fragment (KF) of Esch
erichia coli DNA polymerase I inserted C opposite oh(8)Gua at both pos
itions. Tag DNA polymerase incorporated C and A opposite oh(8)Gua, and
the ratio of C to A was higher at the first position than at the seco
nd position. DNA polymerase a (pol alpha) inserted A and C at the firs
t position, and A at the second position of codon 12, indicating that
the ratio of C to A was higher at the first position. Moreover, we stu
died the extensions of bases paired with oh(8)Gua by DNA polymerases w
ith or without 3'-5' exonuclease activity. G and T opposite oh(8)Gua w
ere removed, and subsequently C was inserted by KF, We found that an o
h(8)Gua:A pair was recognized by the exonuclease activity of the enzym
e and that A was partially subsituted by C. On the other hand, pol alp
ha extended only C and A opposite oh(8)Gua. No difference was observed
with oh(8)Gua at the two positions. These results indicate that the r
atio of nucleotides incorporated opposite oh(8)Gua depends on the sequ
ence context, while there is no particular difference in the extension
of base pairs involving oh(8)Gua by DNA polymerases.