A standard explanation for why sovereign governments repay their debts
is that they must maintain a good reputation to easily borrow more. W
e show that the ability of reputation to support debt depends critical
ly on the assumptions made about institutions. At one extreme, we assu
me that bankers can default on payments they owe to governments. At th
e other, we assume that bankers are committed to honoring contracts ma
de with governments. We show that if bankers can default, then a gover
nment gets enduring benefits from maintaining a good relationship with
bankers and its reputation can support a large amount of borrowing. I
f, however, bankers must honor their contracts, then a government gets
only transient benefits from maintaining a good relationship and its
reputation can support zero borrowing.