Ms. Starr et Bs. Starr, LOCOMOTOR EFFECTS OF AMANTADINE IN THE MOUSE ARE NOT THOSE OF A TYPICAL GLUTAMATE ANTAGONIST, Journal of neural transmission. Parkinson's disease and dementia section, 9(1), 1995, pp. 31-43
Amantadine has been shown to displace [H-3]MK 801 from its binding sit
e on the NMDA receptor. We have therefore studied the motor effects of
amantadine in normal and 24 h reserpine-treated mice to determine whe
ther the behavioural profile of this drug resembles that of other NMDA
receptor antagonists (e.g. MK 801). In common with the latter, amanta
dine (5-40 mg/kg IP) produced a modest dose-dependent sedation in dopa
mine-intact mice, with a reduction in locomotion and other species-typ
ical behaviours (e.g. rearing and grooming), but with no signs of the
hyperactivity, stereotypy, ataxia or loss of muscle tone commonly seen
with MK 801. Amantadine (5-80 mg/kg IP) effected a small increase in
motility in akinetic reserpine-treated mice by itself, but this respon
se was highly variable and not statistically significant. As with MK 8
01, amantadine significantly inhibited the locomotion induced by the s
elective D-2 agonist RU 24213 (5 mg/kg SC) and the mixed D-1/D-2 agoni
st apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg SC) in monomine-depleted mice, without alter
ing the animals' responsiveness to threshold doses of these drugs. How
ever, amantadine did not facilitate the locomotion induced by threshol
d (3 mg/kg IP) or fully active doses (30 mg/kg IP) of the selective D-
1 agonist SKF 38393, which distinguishes amantadine from other NMDA re
ceptor blockers. Since the potentiation of dopamine D-1-dependent loco
motion may be a major factor in the antiparkinson activity of MK 801 a
nd other glutamate receptor antagonists, the inability of amantadine t
o potentiate SKF 38393 in this study suggests the mechanism of its ant
i-akinetic activity differs from that of conventional glutamate blocki
ng drugs.