THE RESPONSES OF GROWING PIGS, OF DIFFERENT SEX AND GENOTYPE, TO DIETARY ENERGY AND PROTEIN

Citation
Mf. Fuller et al., THE RESPONSES OF GROWING PIGS, OF DIFFERENT SEX AND GENOTYPE, TO DIETARY ENERGY AND PROTEIN, Animal Science, 60, 1995, pp. 291-298
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience","Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13577298
Volume
60
Year of publication
1995
Part
2
Pages
291 - 298
Database
ISI
SICI code
1357-7298(1995)60:<291:TROGPO>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Intact male pigs from two nucleus breeding herbs (one predominantly Du roc, DM; the other purebred Large White, LM) together with intact male (RM), castrated male (RC) and female (RF) commercial hybrid pigs were given one of two diets, with the same balanced protein (180 or 240 g/ kg) at three daily rates, the highest being 'to appetite'. Six replica tes of 30 pigs were allocated to these regimes at 40 kg: one replicate was slaughtered immediately to determine initial carcass composition; the remaining pigs were slaughtered at 85 kg when carcass fat and spe cific gravity (SG) were measured. For two replicates this was followed by dissection and chemical analysis: daily gains of carcass lipid and protein were estimated directly for these two replicates and predicte d from carcass weight and SG for the other three. Fed 'to appetite', c astrated males and females ate more than males; LM pigs ate least. All males grew faster than females or castrated males, the DM pigs the fa stest, these rankings being relatively insensitive to feeding level. H owever, both in daily weight gain and daily protein accretion only the males responded to additional dietary protein. Daily body protein acc retion of DM pigs increased linearly with intake on both diets whereas LM pigs showed little response to the highest level of feeding. At th e same daily protein intake all pigs had higher rates of body protein accretion on the low protein diet, showing that they were sensitive to additional dietary energy. Results indicate that an animal's superior ity may result from a greater efficiency of protein utilization or a h igher lean growth potential but that these two characteristics are not simply related.