POPULATION REDUCTIONS OF STRONGYLOCENTROTUS-DROEBACHIENSIS (ECHINODERMATA) IN NORWAY AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF ITS ENDOPARASITE ECHINOMERMELLA-MATSI (NEMATODA)
A. Skadsheim et al., POPULATION REDUCTIONS OF STRONGYLOCENTROTUS-DROEBACHIENSIS (ECHINODERMATA) IN NORWAY AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF ITS ENDOPARASITE ECHINOMERMELLA-MATSI (NEMATODA), Marine ecology. Progress series, 119(1-3), 1995, pp. 199-209
Observations of sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (O. F. Mu
ller) mass mortality at Vega island in mid Norway, and reduced sea urc
hin density in another area 280 km (aerial line) to the south, initiat
ed a more extensive survey of sea urchin and kelp Laminaria hyperborea
(Gunn.) Foslie forest distribution along 700 km of coastline. Records
of the distribution and prevalence of the nematode Echinomermella mat
si Jones and Hagen, 1987, an endoparasite of S. droebachiensis, were a
lso included as the parasite has been postulated to cause sea urchin m
ass mortality. Sampling was concentrated in 5 areas of coastline along
mid and northern Norway. Each area was studied along a wave exposure
gradient. Old kelp forests have persisted along the outermost exposed
parts of the coastline despite the 20 yr population outbreak of sea ur
chins. Inshore of the exposed kelp zone and towards the mainland, sea
urchin dominated barren grounds still persisted. The distribution and
abundance of S. droebachiensis in the southernmost area (Froya) was gr
eatly reduced, and expansion of kelp into former barren grounds result
ed. Reduced numbers of sea urchins and some macroalgal regrowth also o
ccurred in the 2 central areas 140 and 280 km north of Froya, whilst h
igh population densities of small sized S. droebachiensis on 'barrens'
still dominated the inner zone in the 2 northern areas. The study ind
icated that S. droebachiensis populations, and hence the barren ground
state, may be in a labile phase along the southern 300 km of the coas
t, whilst its slate in the northern areas seems more persistent thus f
ar. E. matsi was not found in the southernmost area. S. droebachiensis
was heavily infested in the 2 central areas. In northern areas E. mat
si was found only at a few sites. The pattern of parasite occurrence a
nd sea urchin regression makes the role of E. matsi in this process qu
estionable and indicates that 1 or more unidentified waterborne agents
have been involved.