Si. Smithey, THE EFFECTS OF THE CANADIAN SUPREME-COURT CHARTER INTERPRETATION ON REGIONAL AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL TENSIONS IN CANADA, Publius, 26(2), 1996, pp. 83-100
Canada's adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982 had a
number of unexpected consequences. Many Canadians holed that the Chart
er's adoption would help unify the country by creating a shared set of
civil liberties; yet, it was also feared that the Charter would tip t
he balance of federal power in favor of the federal government because
it allowed the national Supreme Court to oversee provincial policymak
ing. Neither of these predictions has come to lass. In its Charter cas
es, the Supreme Court has neither made the national government its con
stitutional favorite nor helped to unify Canadians. The Court's langua
ge-rights cases helped catalyze Quebecois resentment toward the rest o
f Canada. Its preferential treatment of laws and court decisions from
Ontario has the potential to increase Canada's regional antagonisms as
well. These findings demonstrate that judicial power can have signifi
cant political effects that are not anticipated by constitutional refo
rmers or the constitutions they adopt.