Trypanosoma brucei was first seen by David Bruce in 1894, in the blood
of a cow in South Africa, and named in his honour in 1899. Trypanosom
es seen in the blood of an Englishman in The Gambia in 1901 were named
T. gambiense in 1902. Finally, in 1909, trypanosomes from the blood o
f an Englishman in Zambia (''Rhodesia'') were named T. rhodesiense. Si
nce then there has been continuous debate about the interrelationships
of these three ''species''. Studies of the molecular biology of these
trypanosomes, mainly analyses of their isoenzymes and deoxyribonuclei
c acid, now appear to have shown that T. ''rhodesiense'' cannot be dis
tinguished from T. brucei brucei by any valid and consistent criterion
, while T. ''gambiense'' probably does constitute a valid subspecies o
f T. brucei. There is still doubt whether populations of T. brucei are
predominantly clonal or sexual. While some form of genetic exchange u
ndoubtedly can occur in this species, its nature and frequency are unk
nown and there is evidence that the population structure of T. brucei
is essentially clonal.