P. Williamson et al., ANTECEDENT CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING NEURAL-TUBE DEFECT BIRTHS IN 1990-1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 104(1), 1997, pp. 51-56
Objective To investigate births with neural tube defects at a time whe
n most districts were screening for the condition. The objective was t
o document the circumstances surrounding each affected birth and asses
s the care provided against given standards. Design Retrospective revi
ew of antenatal casenotes by the obstetric team. Population Three hund
red and eight births in England and Wales in 1990 to 1991 were reporte
d to the Office of Population Census Survey (OPCS) to involve neural t
ube defects. Sufficient information was available to identify both the
woman and the obstetrician in 213 pregnancies. Details were obtained
from a questionnaire completed by the obstetric team for 168 (79%). In
20/168 cases either the reported outcome was not a live birth/stillbi
rth or the pregnancy did not involve a neural tube defect: eight resul
ted in a 'normal' infant, eight were terminated and in four the abnorm
ality was not a neural tube defect. Thus 148 eligible cases were avail
able for analysis. Results Of the 148 births, the anomaly was not dete
cted prenatally or detected later than 25 weeks of gestation in 98 cas
es (66%), diagnosed in a multiple pregnancy in 24 (16%) and diagnosed
prenatally but the woman chose to continue the pregnancy in 26 (18%).
Of the 98 births not detected prenatally or detected late during pregn
ancy, the surrounding circumstances were that screening was declined i
n six cases (4%), screening was not offered due to late booking in 30
(20%), serum alpha-fetoprotein screening gave a false negative result
in eight (5%), ultrasound screening gave a false negative result in 29
(20%), both screening methods gave false negative results in 17 (11%)
and other reasons in eight (5%). The estimated sensitivity of ultraso
und screening for anencephaly was 100%. For spina bifida the estimated
sensitivity for singleton pregnancies is higher for serum alpha-fetop
rotein screening, 84% to 92%, than ultrasound screening, 70% to 84%, f
or a range of assumptions regarding the degree of under-reporting to O
PCS of live births and terminations. Conclusions Late booking preclude
d the offer of screening tests in a substantial proportion (22%) of ca
ses. The presence of multiple fetuses including one or more with a neu
ral tube defect was a serious additional complication in prenatal scre
ening, diagnosis and counselling. Screening for neural tube defects wa
s widespread in 1990 to 1991, although variations in the services prov
ided were documented. Ultrasound scanning was a major component but wa
s associated with a lower sensitivity than maternal serum alpha-fetopr
otein screening for neural tube defects other than anencephaly.