Objective To investigate the reasons for cone biopsies reported as not
containing intraepithelial or invasive malignancy and thereby find wa
ys to decrease their incidence. Design One hundred cone biopsies repor
ted as negative were identified out of a total of 436 consecutive cone
biopsies. The patients' cytology, colposcopy and histology reports an
d cytology and histology slides were reviewed. Further opinions in cas
es of doubt were obtained in cytology and histology. In cone biopsies
still considered negative after reviews, deeper levels were cut, exhau
sting all paraffin blocks. Follow up cytology, colposcopy and histolog
y were reviewed. Setting Gynaecological oncology unit in a university
teaching hospital. Results After re-evaluation the final diagnoses of
cone biopsies initially reported as negative were positive (n = 21), u
nsatisfactory (n = 27) and true negative (n = 51), with one case exclu
ded because of insufficient material for review. The positive cases we
re diagnosed on review (n = 11) or extra levels (n = 10). The unsatisf
actory cases were all due to denudation. The 51 true negative cases we
re divided into those which never had had histologic confirmation by p
unch biopsy or endocervical curettage (n = 47) and those with a previo
usly confirmed histological abnormality (n = 4). Conclusions The numbe
r of negative cone biopsies can be reduced by: 1. taking Pap smears af
ter correction of atrophy and inflammation; 2. more scrupulous colposc
opy aimed at reducing the number of unsatisfactory colposcopies or mis
interpreted colposcopic findings; this thorough examination should inc
lude the vagina and vulva; 3. confirmation of smear and colposcopic fi
ndings by biopsy prior to cold-knife conisation and performing a large
loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) for cases where ther
e is a discrepancy between the smear abnormality and colposcopy/biopsy
findings; 4. good quality cone biopsies using a technique that does n
ot handle the mucosa and is performed after the mucosa has had time to
regenerate following the colposcopic investigations; and 5. exhaustin
g all blocks with multiple levels before reporting a cone biopsy as ne
gative.