C. Gollier et H. Schlesinger, 2ND-BEST INSURANCE CONTRACT DESIGN IN AN INCOMPLETE MARKET, The Scandinavian journal of economics, 97(1), 1995, pp. 123-135
The optimal form of insurance contracts for multiple risks is examined
. A well-known result in the literature is that, under fairly general
conditions, an insurance policy with a deductible for aggregate losses
is optimal. Real-world markets, however, are typically incomplete in
that they require separate contracts for separate loss exposures. For
instance, insurable damage to one's home is not generally allowed to a
ffect the insurance indemnity for (unrelated) insurable damage to one'
s automobile. We show that separate deductibles are second-best optima
in this setting. We compare the indemnity provided in this second-bes
t setting with first-best solutions. The effect of second-best contrac
ts on the individual's total insurance demand is also examined.