T. Ekstrom et al., DOSE POTENCY RELATIONSHIP OF TERBUTALINE INHALED VIA TURBUHALER OR VIA A PRESSURIZED METERED-DOSE INHALER, Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 74(4), 1995, pp. 328-332
Objective: The relative dose potency of cumulative doses of terbutalin
e sulfate inhaled via Turbuhaler and via a pressurized metered dose in
haler was estimated with respect to lung efficacy and systemic effect.
Methods: The study was an open, crossover, randomized, multicenter st
udy including 31 adult patients with asthma [forced expiratory volume
in one second (FEV(1)), 65% of predicted]. The patients inhaled terbut
aline doses of 0.125, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg (a total of 4
mg) at 30-minute intervals. Lung function [FEV(1), forced vital capaci
ty (FVC), forced expiratory flow at 75% of FVC (FEF(75%)), and peak ex
piratory flow (PEF)], and systemic effect variables (serum potassium,
tremor, pulse, blood pressure) were monitored prior to the first inhal
ation and 15 to 25 minutes after each inhaled dose. Results: The mean
relative dose potency of terbutaline inhaled via Turbuhaler compared w
ith pressurized metered dose inhaler was 1.5 (95% confidence interval:
1.2 to 1.8) with respect to FEV(1) and serum potassium, respectively.
The corresponding relative dose potencies for PEF, FVC, and FEF(75%)
were 1.0, 1.2, 1.6, respectively, with no statistically significant di
fference between the two devices. No differences between the devices w
ere evident with regard to blood pressure and pulse. Conclusion: The r
esults suggest that Turbuhaler is more efficient in the delivery of in
haled terbutaline to the lungs compared with the conventional pressuri
zed metered dose inhaler.