Pd. Clouston et al., MODULATION OF MOTOR-ACTIVITY BY CUTANEOUS INPUT - INHIBITION OF THE MAGNETIC MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIAL BY DIGITAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION, ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 97(2), 1995, pp. 114-125
We examined the inhibitory effect of a brief train of digital (D2) ele
ctrical stimuli at 4 times perception threshold on transcranial magnet
ic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from abductor pollicis brev
is (APE) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles ipsilateral to the si
de of D2 stimulation. We compared this to the inhibitory effect of ips
ilateral D2 stimulation on averaged rectified EMG recorded at 10% maxi
mum voluntary contraction and on F-responses and H-reflexes recorded f
rom these same muscles. We also compared MEPs recorded following D2 st
imulation just above perception threshold to MEPs following higher int
ensity D2 stimulation. As well, we assessed the effect of preceding D2
stimulation on MEPs recorded from a relaxed versus tonically contract
ed hand muscle. D2 stimulation elicited a triphasic response of modest
MEP facilitation followed by inhibition and further facilitation. The
duration and onset of MEP inhibition correlated with those of the ini
tial period of rectified EMG inhibition, however, the magnitude of MEP
inhibition was generally less than the magnitude of EMG inhibition, c
onsistent with a greater inhibitory effect of digital afferents on sma
ller motor neurons. MEPs were not facilitated during the rebound of EM
G activity (the E2 period) that usually followed the initial period of
EMG inhibition (I1 period). The behavior of H-reflexes and F-response
s following ipsilateral D2 stimulation suggested that inhibition of bo
th EMG and MEPs is not mediated via presynaptic inhibition of Ia affer
ents, and that inhibition is augmented by descending rather than segme
ntal input to spinal motor neurons. Tonic contraction of the target mu
scle during D2 stimulation decreased the inhibitory effect of the prec
eding digital stimulus possibly due to recruitment of larger spinal mo
tor neurons less likely to be inhibited by cutaneous input.