Em. Goodger, JET FUELS DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERNATIVES, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part G, Journal of aerospace engineering, 209(2), 1995, pp. 147-156
The jet engine group comprises aero turbines, ramjets and rockets, the
ir level of performance increasing in that order, with fuel requiremen
ts showing both similarities and differences. The conventional fuel fo
r aero turbine engines,for example, is aviation kerosine, several vari
ants of which exist for specific applications. Aviation fuel specifica
tions are invariably stringent, and variations with density are shown
for typical properties. The dwindling availability of optimal crudes o
ver the last 25 years has resulted in a general degradation in the qua
lity of aviation kerosine, with adverse effects on combustion performa
nce, emissions and engine life except where hardware solutions emerged
in parallel. In fact, the reduction of emissions is seen to be more a
matter of engine design than fuel technology. In the near term, suppl
ies of kerosine may be supplemented from sources other than crude oil,
whereas in the longer term, kerosine may be substituted by liquid met
hane and/or liquid hydrogen. In comparison with kerosine, liquid hydro
gen produces more nitrogen in its combustion products on a fuel mass b
asis, but less on an energy basis, although the flame temperature is h
igher giving possibilities of more NO,. The fuel requirements of high
energy content and storage stability apply across the board, but addit
ional parameters of concern are heat capacity in the case of ramjets,
and combustion-product chemistry with rockets, which demand a range of
candidate high-performance fuels.