Two methods for thermal conductivity determinations on rock cores and
fragments were tested on a suite of samples from the Kontinentales Tie
fbohrprogramm der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (KTB) superdeep drill hol
e in Germany. They were also compared with estimates of thermal conduc
tivity using the mineral composition of the rock and physical well log
s and with in situ thermal conductivity measurements. Laboratory metho
ds provide reasonably precise determinations of the thermal conductivi
ties of both solid core (+/-5%) and drill cuttings (+/-10%) at room te
mperature and pressure. The most common methods presently used for cry
stalline rocks are the steady state ''divided-bar'' (DB) technique and
the transient ''half-space'' line source (LS). Sample preparation and
measurement times are comparable for the DB and LS, with sample prepa
ration being more time consuming on average. For isotropic rocks there
is little to choose from between the two methods, which both give rel
iable values of conductivity in the vertical direction. The LS is easi
er to set up and use in field laboratory situations, which renders it
the preferred method for field reconnaissance. The gneissic crystallin
e rocks penetrated by the KTB boreholes typically have anisotropy of t
he order of 10-20%. The DB provides unambiguous values of conductivity
in a given direction, so its use is preferable for obtaining both pri
ncipal conductivities and the vertical component. Anisotropy can be es
timated using LS measurements in many different directions, but the po
tential for large random errors is much greater than with the more str
aightforward DB approach. For deep research wells the difficulties of
extrapolating laboratory results to in situ conditions (particularly t
emperature) present additional obstacles to determining heat flow. Lab
oratory measurements of water-saturated samples under in situ conditio
ns, combined with in situ measurements and judicious use of calculatio
ns based on mineralogy and well log derived physical properties, can a
id in the accurate characterization of thermal conductivity in deep we
lls. The application of different methods helped to link variations of
heat flow with depth in the KTB hole to the anisotropy of thermal con
ductivity or thermal refraction and thus allowed the calculation of ba
ckground heat flux in this geologically complex area.