ASSESSING HALON ALTERNATIVES FOR AIRCRAFT ENGINE NACELLE FIRE SUPPRESSION

Citation
W. Grosshandler et al., ASSESSING HALON ALTERNATIVES FOR AIRCRAFT ENGINE NACELLE FIRE SUPPRESSION, Journal of heat transfer, 117(2), 1995, pp. 489-494
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Mechanical",Thermodynamics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00221481
Volume
117
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
489 - 494
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1481(1995)117:2<489:AHAFAE>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
A coaxial turbulent spray burner was built to evaluate the relative ef fectiveness of different chemicals for suppressing fires in a jet engi ne nacelle. The fire suppressant of current choice, halon 1301 (CF3Br) , must be replaced because of its detrimental effect on the ozone laye r. The alternatives being considered lack the chemical activity of CF3 Br, so that the ability of the agents to mix into the flame convective ly and to absorb heat is critical to their success. An agent delivery system was designed to inject the desired amount of material into the air upstream of a fuel nozzle and to control the agent injection rate through variation of the storage pressure and the duration of time tha t a solenoid valve remains open. The influence of air velocity, fuel f low, and injection period on the amount of nitrogen required to exting uish a jet fuel spray flame is discussed. The effectiveness of eleven different fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, and hydrochlorofluorocarb ons is compared to that of halon 1301. The alternatives required 1.7 t o 2.3 times the amount (on a mass basis) of CF3Br to extinguish the sp ray flame, with HCFC-22 being the most efficient and FC-31-10 the leas t.