J. Fleming et al., COMPARISON OF THE RESIDUAL EFFECTS AND EFFICACY OF SHORT-TERM ZOLPIDEM, FLURAZEPAM AND PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INSOMNIA, Clinical drug investigation, 9(6), 1995, pp. 303-313
This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parall
el group study compared the next-day residual effects, hypnotic effica
cy and sleep staging effects of zolpidem 10 and 20mg with those of pla
cebo in patients with chronic insomnia. Flurazepam 30mg was used as a
positive control for residual effects. Patients completed written and
computerised performance tests [Digital Symbol Substitution Test (DSST
) was the primary outcome measure], and their sleep was evaluated poly
somnographically and subjectively. After treatment with zolpidem for 3
consecutive nights, the change from baseline in number of correct res
ponses on the next-morning DSST or Symbol Copying Test (SCT) was not d
ifferent to that recorded in placebo-treated patients. Next-day perfor
mance was impaired every day after treatment with flurazepam. As measu
red by objective and subjective criteria, both zolpidem and flurazepam
were effective hypnotics. Sleep stages were affected more by flurazep
am than by zolpidem. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event
s was approximately the same for zolpidem 10mg, flurazepam and placebo
. The 20mg dose of zolpidem (twice the therapeutic dose) was associate
d with a higher incidence of adverse events. It was concluded that no
next-day residual effects are associated with nightly intake (3 nights
) of the recommended dose of zolpidem. At this dose, zolpidem was an e
ffective and safe hypnotic.