Ai. Hartstein et al., CONTROL OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN A HOSPITAL AND AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT, Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 16(7), 1995, pp. 405-411
OBJECTIVE: To describe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MR
SA) control in a hospital, including a surgical intensive care unit (S
ICU) outbreak. DESIGN: Prospective surveillance of newly identified pa
tients with MRSA. Barrier isolation (disposable gloves for direct cont
act with patient or immediate environment) was used for the routine ca
re of hospitalized MRSA patients as of October 1991. Beginning in 1992
, MRSA isolates were typed by restriction endonuclease enzyme analysis
of plasmid DNA (REAP) and/or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of geno
mic DNA (PFGE). Surveillance information and MRSA typing were used con
currently to identify nosocomial case clustering, confirm cross-infect
ion and support a need for additional outbreak control interventions.
SETTING: University-affiliated public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients
with newly identified MRSA colonization or infection from 1991 throug
h 1993 and epidemiologically associated staff providing care to eight
SICU patients in an outbreak. INTERVENTIONS: Barrier isolation for aff
ected and unaffected patients in and admitted to the SICU institution
when the outbreak was identified and cross-infection confirmed, Anteri
or nares cultures of staff in contact with outbreak cases for detectio
n of MRSA colonization. RESULTS: Fifty-six hospitalized patients with
community-acquired MRSA and 80 patients with nosocomial MRSA colonizat
ion or infection were identified during the 3 years. After the introdu
ction of barrier isolation, the annual frequency of new nosocomial MRS
A cases decreased and only one outbreak (eight cases in the SICU) caus
ed by type-related isolates occurred. The other 35 nosocomial cases of
MRSA during 1992 and 1993 were not epidemiologically related or were
caused by isolates with different types. The SICU outbreak ended after
instituting barrier isolation for all patients (with and without MRSA
) in and admitted to the unit. Six colonized SICU staff were identifie
d. All outbreak cases had identical or related MRSA types by PFGE and
REAP. Staff isolates were different from case isolates by typing, and
staff were not restricted and not given treatment for colonization. Af
ter more than 6 months of follow up, no further outbreaks of MRSA in t
he SICU or elsewhere in the hospital occurred despite returning to bar
rier isolation for affected patients only. CONCLUSION MRSA in hospital
s and outbreaks of MRSA in ICUs can be controlled by surveillance and
minimal barrier interventions. REAP or PFGE typing of MRSA can be used
to support or refute the presence of cross-transmission. Typing also
may be helpful when planning and assessing the effectiveness of interv
entions directed at endemic, as well as outbreak, MRSA control (Infect
Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:405-411).