CONTROL OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN A HOSPITAL AND AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT

Citation
Ai. Hartstein et al., CONTROL OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN A HOSPITAL AND AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT, Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 16(7), 1995, pp. 405-411
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
0899823X
Volume
16
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
405 - 411
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-823X(1995)16:7<405:COMSIA>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MR SA) control in a hospital, including a surgical intensive care unit (S ICU) outbreak. DESIGN: Prospective surveillance of newly identified pa tients with MRSA. Barrier isolation (disposable gloves for direct cont act with patient or immediate environment) was used for the routine ca re of hospitalized MRSA patients as of October 1991. Beginning in 1992 , MRSA isolates were typed by restriction endonuclease enzyme analysis of plasmid DNA (REAP) and/or pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of geno mic DNA (PFGE). Surveillance information and MRSA typing were used con currently to identify nosocomial case clustering, confirm cross-infect ion and support a need for additional outbreak control interventions. SETTING: University-affiliated public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with newly identified MRSA colonization or infection from 1991 throug h 1993 and epidemiologically associated staff providing care to eight SICU patients in an outbreak. INTERVENTIONS: Barrier isolation for aff ected and unaffected patients in and admitted to the SICU institution when the outbreak was identified and cross-infection confirmed, Anteri or nares cultures of staff in contact with outbreak cases for detectio n of MRSA colonization. RESULTS: Fifty-six hospitalized patients with community-acquired MRSA and 80 patients with nosocomial MRSA colonizat ion or infection were identified during the 3 years. After the introdu ction of barrier isolation, the annual frequency of new nosocomial MRS A cases decreased and only one outbreak (eight cases in the SICU) caus ed by type-related isolates occurred. The other 35 nosocomial cases of MRSA during 1992 and 1993 were not epidemiologically related or were caused by isolates with different types. The SICU outbreak ended after instituting barrier isolation for all patients (with and without MRSA ) in and admitted to the unit. Six colonized SICU staff were identifie d. All outbreak cases had identical or related MRSA types by PFGE and REAP. Staff isolates were different from case isolates by typing, and staff were not restricted and not given treatment for colonization. Af ter more than 6 months of follow up, no further outbreaks of MRSA in t he SICU or elsewhere in the hospital occurred despite returning to bar rier isolation for affected patients only. CONCLUSION MRSA in hospital s and outbreaks of MRSA in ICUs can be controlled by surveillance and minimal barrier interventions. REAP or PFGE typing of MRSA can be used to support or refute the presence of cross-transmission. Typing also may be helpful when planning and assessing the effectiveness of interv entions directed at endemic, as well as outbreak, MRSA control (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1995;16:405-411).