F. Koskas et al., ARTERIES FROM HUMAN-BEINGS ARE LESS INFECTIBLE BY STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS THAN POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE IN AN AORTIC DOG-MODEL, Journal of vascular surgery, 23(3), 1996, pp. 472-476
Purpose: Treatment of aortoiliac prosthetic graft infections includes
the removal of the infected material and repeat revascularization if n
ecessary. The risk of infection of the graft material used for the rep
eat revascularization has been the drawback of its use in situ except
with autografts. Good results were obtained in this setting by use of
in situ arterial allografts. The purpose of our study was to compare i
n vivo the infectibility of arteries used as allografts to the infecti
bility of commercially available prostheses. Methods: Twelve dogs unde
rwent thoracoabdominal aortic bypass with use of either an artery from
a human being (n = 6) or an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)
graft (n = 6). One month later, bacteremia was produced with Staphyloc
occus aureus. One week after bacterial challenge, the animals were kil
led to recover the grafts. Each graft then underwent bacterial study.
Results: None of the arterial grafts grew bacteria, whereas four of th
e six ePTFE grafts (p < 0.05) did. In addition, none of the fragments
of the arterial grafts grew bacteria, whereas 24 of the 60 ePTFE fragm
ents (p < 0.01) did. Conclusion: Nonautologous arteries are less infec
tible than ePTFE in vivo. This decreased infectibility makes the arter
ial allograft an appealing material when revascularization must be per
formed in a contaminated field.